Difference between revisions of "Newsecosystem"

From IVP Wiki
(Idea catalysts)
 
(47 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
=Event Page: "From Paper to Persona to Payment:<br><br>Considering a New(s) Ecosystem for News, Information and Privacy."=
 
=Event Page: "From Paper to Persona to Payment:<br><br>Considering a New(s) Ecosystem for News, Information and Privacy."=
  
<big>This is the temporary landing page for a <b>May 7, 2015</b> gathering organized by the Donald W. Reynolds Journalism Institute. If you are interested in participating, please email [mailto:densmorew@rjionline.org Bill Densmore,] or call Bill at 617-448-6600. The standing URL: http://www.newsecosystem.org will reach current updates.</big>  
+
<big>This is the archive landing page for the <b>May 7, 2015</b> [http://newshare.com/wiki/index.php/Newsecosystem-participants gathering] organized by the Donald W. Reynolds Journalism Institute and held at the Chicago O'Hare Hilton. It kicked off a series of four meetings of the Information Trust Exchange project. For more information, please email [mailto:densmorew@rjionline.org Bill Densmore,] or call Bill at 617-448-6600.</big>  
 
<BR>
 
<BR>
 +
 +
<H3>[http://newshare.com/ohare/ohare-agenda.pdf AGENDA] / [http://newshare.com/ohare/call-to-action.pdf CALL TO ACTION] / [http://newshare.com/ohare/bullet-points.pdf BULLET POINTS] / [http://newshare.com/ohare/ohare-case-for-ite.pdf CASE STATEMENT] / [http://newshare.com/ohare/publisher-invitation-case-statement.pdf PUBLISHER INVITATION] / [http://newshare.com/ohare/stalking-horse.pdf STALKING HORSE] / [http://newshare.com/wiki/index.php/Newsecosystem-participants PARTICIPANTS]<BR></H3>
 +
==CRITICAL LINKS==
 +
*[https://groups.google.com/forum/#!categories/information-trust-exchange-project The Information Trust Exchange Google Group blog]
 +
*Emily Bell, Columbia-Tow Center, on [http://www.cjr.org/analysis/google_facebook_frenemy.php Why news organizations should be building their own platform]  (READ last paragraph) (posted 05-02-15)  [https://gigaom.com/2015/01/30/emily-bell-social-networks-and-journalists-need-to-work-together/ RELATED LINK]
 +
*Alexander Klopping, the co-founder of Blendle, [https://medium.com/on-blendle/blendle-a-radical-experiment-with-micropayments-in-journalism-365-days-later-f3b799022edc reports what the Dutch micropayment startup has learned in its first year] (posted 05-01-15)
 +
*Bruce Schneier: [{http://newshare.com/ohare/schneier-inevitable.pdf "The Hidden Battle to Collect Your Data"] (posted 04-28-15)
 +
*Jeff Jarvis [http://buzzmachine.com/2015/03/24/relationship-stupid/ on the need for open standards for identity-data transfer:] "It's the relationship, stupid!"
 +
*BACKGROUND: Google's [http://www.digitalnewsinitiative.com/ Digital News Initiative] with eight European publishers.  [http://googlepolicyeurope.blogspot.com/2015/04/lets-work-together-to-support-quality.html  SPEECH] / Stories on the [http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-32486019 BBC,], the [http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/04/28/googles-reaches-out-to-european-publishers-with-165-million-in-hand/ New York Times], at the [http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2015/04/28/google-offers-e150-million-olive-branch-to-european-publishers/ Wall Street Journal], and the [http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/29ceea6a-ecf8-11e4-bebf-00144feab7de.html#axzz3Z4z20aqV Financial Times].
 +
*Buzz Wurzer and Bill Densmore on [https://www.clickshare.com/mission/history "the four-party model."]
 +
*Tom Grubisich writing at SreetFightMag: [http://streetfightmag.com/2015/01/29/can-an-exchange-help-solve-the-problem-of-monetizing-digital-news/ Can an exchange help solve the problem of monetizing digital content?]
 +
*PRIVACY/IDENTITY / Drummond Reed and Ann Cavoukian: [https://www.privacybydesign.ca/content/uploads/2013/12/pbd-big_privacy.pdf A primer on personal clouds, XDI, link contracts, accountable pseudonyms, and contractual anonymity]
 +
*STRUCTURE / Bill Densmore: [http://www.newshare.com/wiki/index.php/Blueprint-form A "stalking horse" for ITE governance]
 +
<br>
 +
 +
==ARCHIVE LINKS==
 +
*COLLABORATION: RJI-O'Hare participant Jo Ellen Green Kaiser's [http://newshare.com/ohare/media-consortium-report.pdf report on the need for collaboration and new funding approaches] for independent news.
 +
*CONTENT: Washington Post [http://www.washingtonpost.com/pr/wp/2015/05/04/the-washington-post-to-test-new-web-experience-for-expanding-readership/ breaks new ground] in dramatically visual formatting its desktop experience  [http://www.washingtonpost.com/rweb (SEE EXAMPLE)] 
 +
*GOVERNANCE: Could Europe create common rules for digital commerce?  An [http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/europe-unveils-digital-single-market-793781 effort is underway]
 +
*IDENTITY: IBM asserts partnership with Facebook to use IBM's [http://techcrunch.com/2015/05/05/ibm-partners-with-facebook analytics capabilities to deliver better personalized ad targetting]
 +
*REVENUE: Some publishers are [http://digiday.com/publishers/search-native-advertisings-new-pricing-models/throwing the content-creation costs of "native advertising" in for free] to maintain competitive rates
 +
*PRICING: Bundling [http://www.newyorker.com/business/currency/the-dreaded-bundle-comes-to-internet-tv comes to the web]
 +
<br>
 +
 
==THE DRAFT REPORT:==
 
==THE DRAFT REPORT:==
 
*[http://newshare.com/report.pdf PDF DOWNLOAD:] Draft report "From Persona to Payment."
 
*[http://newshare.com/report.pdf PDF DOWNLOAD:] Draft report "From Persona to Payment."
Line 17: Line 41:
  
 
==Idea catalysts==
 
==Idea catalysts==
*Jeff Jarvis [http://buzzmachine.com/2015/03/24/relationship-stupid/ on the need for open standards for identity-data transfer:] "It's the relationship, stupid!"
+
*What is [http://www.advisortising.com advisortising?] (Bill Densmore)
*What is [http://www.advisortising.com advisortising?]
+
*Robert Picard explains how a wholesale-retail market [http://newshare.com/ohare/picard-wholesale-retail.pdf could function with digital information]
*Buzz Wurzer and Bill Densmore on [http://www.clickshare.com/?page_id=456 "the four-party model."]
 
 
*What can the ITE do to give news organizations a "persona" competitor to Google and Facebook [http://www.adweek.com/news/technology/googles-planned-data-management-platform-key-competing-facebook-164210 (see ADWEEK on Google effort)]
 
*What can the ITE do to give news organizations a "persona" competitor to Google and Facebook [http://www.adweek.com/news/technology/googles-planned-data-management-platform-key-competing-facebook-164210 (see ADWEEK on Google effort)]
*NYU Prof. Clay Shirky, [http://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/04/10/a-darker-narrative-of-prints-future-from-clay-shirky/ summarized by the NYT Public Editor] and commenting on our O'Hare gathering: "This looks amazing . . . we're in Shanghai this year, so I won't be able to join you, but I'm so glad you all are doing this." READ ALSO: Shirky's 2009 post: [http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2009/03/newspapers-and-thinking-the-unthinkable/ "Newspapers and Thinking the Unthinkable."]
+
*NYU Prof. Clay Shirky, [http://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/04/10/a-darker-narrative-of-prints-future-from-clay-shirky/ summarized by the NYT Public Editor] and commenting on our O'Hare gathering: "This looks amazing . . . we're in Shanghai this year, so I won't be able to join you, but I'm so glad you all are doing this." READ ALSO: Shirky's 2009 post: [http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2009/03/newspapers-and-thinking-the-unthinkable/ "Newspapers and Thinking the Unthinkable"] and Mathew Ingram's [https://medium.com/@mathewi/winter-is-coming-print-revenue-could-be-headed-for-another-cliff-51e29836bb20 comments on same,] with chart.
 
*Washington Post Executive Editor Marty Baron on [http://www.washingtonpost.com/pr/wp/2015/04/08/washington-post-executive-editor-martin-baron-on-journalisms-transition-from-print-to-digital/?postshare=6831428508430015 journalism's transition from print to digital.]
 
*Washington Post Executive Editor Marty Baron on [http://www.washingtonpost.com/pr/wp/2015/04/08/washington-post-executive-editor-martin-baron-on-journalisms-transition-from-print-to-digital/?postshare=6831428508430015 journalism's transition from print to digital.]
<br>
+
*THE NEW NEWS SERVICE? [http://www.theatlantic.com/features/archive/2015/04/the-eternal-return-of-buzzfeed/390270/ "The Eternal Return of BuzzFeed"]
 
 
==What more experts say==
 
 
 
*Tom Grubisich writing at SreetFightMag: [http://streetfightmag.com/2015/01/29/can-an-exchange-help-solve-the-problem-of-monetizing-digital-news/ Can an exchange help solve the problem of monetizing digital content?]
 
 
*[http://www.newshare.com/wiki/index.php/Persona-comments-Paul_Gillin_former_ComputerWorld_editor#.22A_paid_content_model_that_makes_sense_._._._can_it_work.3F_It_has_to.22 Paul Gillin:] "Can Densmore's vision work? It has to."
 
*[http://www.newshare.com/wiki/index.php/Persona-comments-Paul_Gillin_former_ComputerWorld_editor#.22A_paid_content_model_that_makes_sense_._._._can_it_work.3F_It_has_to.22 Paul Gillin:] "Can Densmore's vision work? It has to."
 
*[http://radar.oreilly.com/2011/08/reynold-journalism-proposal.html Andy Oram:] "Why a new proposal for making the news business sustainable deserves attention."
 
*[http://radar.oreilly.com/2011/08/reynold-journalism-proposal.html Andy Oram:] "Why a new proposal for making the news business sustainable deserves attention."
 
* BACKGROUND: [http://www.infovalet.org The Information Valet project]<br><br>
 
* BACKGROUND: [http://www.infovalet.org The Information Valet project]<br><br>
  
==Links to new FTC initiative==
+
==Links to new FTC tech/privacy initiative==
 
*http://www.engadget.com/2015/03/23/ftc-office-of-technology-research/
 
*http://www.engadget.com/2015/03/23/ftc-office-of-technology-research/
 
*http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2015/03/23/the-ftc-beefs-up-technology-investigations-with-new-office/
 
*http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2015/03/23/the-ftc-beefs-up-technology-investigations-with-new-office/
Line 38: Line 57:
  
 
<br>
 
<br>
 +
 +
==Extended thoughts==
 +
 +
*These comments were appended to a New York Times Public Editor blog post of April 10, 2015: [http://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/04/10/a-darker-narrative-of-prints-future-from-clay-shirky/ "A Darker Narrative of Print's Future from Clay Shirky"]
 +
<ul><ul>
 +
 +
[http://wwww.marcedge.com Marc Edge] -- journalism educator, media critic, and blogger from Vancouver/Richmond, BC -- wrote: "Shirky’s hypothesis is indeed speculative. This discussion reminds me of most of the uninformed speculation regarding the future of newspapers that has been going on for the past seven years, since the Rocky Mountain News folded and the Seattle P-I went online-only. I have done quite a bit of research into the business model of newspapers and I have concluded in my recent book, Greatly Exaggerated: The Myth of the Death of Newspapers, that it actually quite robust and should allow the venerable newspaper to survive in print form for the foreseeable future. There’s one very good reason -- they are all still profitable. Here’s a review of my research: [http://en.ejo.ch/media-economics/business-models/north-american-newspapers-still-profitable "Why are American Newspapers Still Profitable."] ...  Here’s a [http://www.straight.com/life/796356/marc-edges-greatly-exaggerated-reveals-why-death-newspapers-overstated review of my book] ... Here’s an excerpt: http://www.marcedge.com/GEintro.pdf  "
 +
<br><br>
 +
 +
Les Gapay -- Palm Desert, CA -- wrote: "I'm a retired newspaper reporter who worked at both the national and local levels. I don't subscribe to a paper anymore. They're not worth the money and I can read all the news I want for free online at Google or Yahoo from publications all around the U.S. and the world. Less than once a month I pick up a hard copy of a paper if I want to just sit down and relax with a newspaper for a while. I spend a lot of time during each day reading news online and get my fill, so why bother with a print edition. The hey-day of print journalism is over. We're in the middle of the move to digital. How quickly print papers disappear is irrelevant to me and is mostly relevant to executives of newspapers. Their digital form will survive and maybe a weekly paper edition full of features and analyses for reading on the weekend. Reporting is done mainly by newspapers and that will continue. Readers want journalism. News has to be covered. When there are breaking stories I watch them live on TV or read about them on my cell phone. Print editions have one foot in the grave, but are resurrecting online. Focus on making the transition. As for subscribing to news web sites, I don't have to right now; can read most of what I want for free paid for by advertising. But I wouldn't mind paying if I had to or if the content was especially good. Times web site too cluttered and stories too long and too wordy. <u>'''If I had to, I would prefer to pay for a site that gives me stories from many news providers.'''
 +
</u></ul></ul>
 +
 +
  
 
[[Category:Newsecosystem]]
 
[[Category:Newsecosystem]]
 
[[Category:Ite]]
 
[[Category:Ite]]

Latest revision as of 14:41, 10 March 2019

PRIVACY . . . IDENTITY . . . ADVERTISING . . . COMMERCE

INFOVALET AT REYNOLDS JOURNALISM INSTITUTE . . . ABOUT THE NEW(S)SOCIAL NETWORK . . . OTHER LINKS/COMMENT . . .VIDEO RESOURCES


Event Page: "From Paper to Persona to Payment:

Considering a New(s) Ecosystem for News, Information and Privacy."

This is the archive landing page for the May 7, 2015 gathering organized by the Donald W. Reynolds Journalism Institute and held at the Chicago O'Hare Hilton. It kicked off a series of four meetings of the Information Trust Exchange project. For more information, please email Bill Densmore, or call Bill at 617-448-6600.

AGENDA / CALL TO ACTION / BULLET POINTS / CASE STATEMENT / PUBLISHER INVITATION / STALKING HORSE / PARTICIPANTS

CRITICAL LINKS


ARCHIVE LINKS


THE DRAFT REPORT:


Idea catalysts

Links to new FTC tech/privacy initiative


Extended thoughts

      Marc Edge -- journalism educator, media critic, and blogger from Vancouver/Richmond, BC -- wrote: "Shirky’s hypothesis is indeed speculative. This discussion reminds me of most of the uninformed speculation regarding the future of newspapers that has been going on for the past seven years, since the Rocky Mountain News folded and the Seattle P-I went online-only. I have done quite a bit of research into the business model of newspapers and I have concluded in my recent book, Greatly Exaggerated: The Myth of the Death of Newspapers, that it actually quite robust and should allow the venerable newspaper to survive in print form for the foreseeable future. There’s one very good reason -- they are all still profitable. Here’s a review of my research: "Why are American Newspapers Still Profitable." ... Here’s a review of my book ... Here’s an excerpt: http://www.marcedge.com/GEintro.pdf "

      Les Gapay -- Palm Desert, CA -- wrote: "I'm a retired newspaper reporter who worked at both the national and local levels. I don't subscribe to a paper anymore. They're not worth the money and I can read all the news I want for free online at Google or Yahoo from publications all around the U.S. and the world. Less than once a month I pick up a hard copy of a paper if I want to just sit down and relax with a newspaper for a while. I spend a lot of time during each day reading news online and get my fill, so why bother with a print edition. The hey-day of print journalism is over. We're in the middle of the move to digital. How quickly print papers disappear is irrelevant to me and is mostly relevant to executives of newspapers. Their digital form will survive and maybe a weekly paper edition full of features and analyses for reading on the weekend. Reporting is done mainly by newspapers and that will continue. Readers want journalism. News has to be covered. When there are breaking stories I watch them live on TV or read about them on my cell phone. Print editions have one foot in the grave, but are resurrecting online. Focus on making the transition. As for subscribing to news web sites, I don't have to right now; can read most of what I want for free paid for by advertising. But I wouldn't mind paying if I had to or if the content was especially good. Times web site too cluttered and stories too long and too wordy. If I had to, I would prefer to pay for a site that gives me stories from many news providers.