Difference between revisions of "Itega-governance-stepanovich"

From IVP Wiki
 
(18 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<br>
  
===JAN. 16, 2019 NOTES FROM:===
+
==SEE ALSO:==
 +
 
 +
*Notes from 2010-2017 of potential member classes:
 +
===http://newshare.com/wiki/index.php/Blueprint-form===
 +
<hr>
 +
<br>
 +
==JAN. 16, 2019 NOTES FROM:==
  
 
Amie Stepanovich
 
Amie Stepanovich
U.S. Policy Manager | Global Policy Counsel
+
U.S. Policy Manager | Global Policy Counsel<br>
Access Now Washington, D.C. | accessnow.org
+
Access Now Washington, D.C. | accessnow.org<br>
tel: +1.202.573.4721
+
tel: +1.202.573.4721<br>
 
amie@accessnow.org
 
amie@accessnow.org
 
+
<br><br>
 
People I would highly recommend outreach with:  
 
People I would highly recommend outreach with:  
 
+
<br>
 
*Ian Glazer, https://www.linkedin.com/in/iglazer
 
*Ian Glazer, https://www.linkedin.com/in/iglazer
 
*Michael Garcia, https://www.zdnet.com/article/gov-led-id-plan-has-new-leader-new-phase-new-goals/
 
*Michael Garcia, https://www.zdnet.com/article/gov-led-id-plan-has-new-leader-new-phase-new-goals/
 
*Jeremy Grant, https://www.venable.com/jeremy-a-grant/
 
*Jeremy Grant, https://www.venable.com/jeremy-a-grant/
  
+
<br>
  
 
=What is ITEGA?=
 
=What is ITEGA?=
  
--Pyramid strucure--
+
==Pyramid strucure==
  
Membership > Advisory Board > Governing Board > Board of Director
+
*Membership > Advisory Board > Governing Board > Board of Director
 +
<br>
  
 
==Stakeholders (thought exercise draft)==
 
==Stakeholders (thought exercise draft)==
Line 51: Line 59:
 
**Journalists
 
**Journalists
  
 
+
<hr>
 
==Proposed tiered structure==
 
==Proposed tiered structure==
  
---Small Board of Directors (perhaps 1/stakeholder group)---
+
===Small Board of Directors (perhaps 1/stakeholder group)===
  
 
*Governing Board (3-5/stakeholder group - set working groups, draft documents, consult between Board of Directors, Advisory Board, Membership)
 
*Governing Board (3-5/stakeholder group - set working groups, draft documents, consult between Board of Directors, Advisory Board, Membership)
Line 61: Line 69:
  
 
*Membership at large - this could just be publishers or interested parties at large
 
*Membership at large - this could just be publishers or interested parties at large
 
+
*(Thought of representatives elected equally between those who are promoted from within the stakeholder group and those promoted by the group at large-- think of U.S. Senate v. HoR)
 
 
*(Thought of representatives elected equally between those who are promoted from within the stakeholder group and those promoted by the group at large-- think of US senate v. HoR)
 
  
 
*Note IDESG as a model: https://idesg.edufoundation.kantarainitiative.org/index.html
 
*Note IDESG as a model: https://idesg.edufoundation.kantarainitiative.org/index.html
  
 
*Note also the transparency/documentation inherent in their development of documents and policies: https://wiki.idesg.org/wiki/index.php/Privacy_Requirements
 
*Note also the transparency/documentation inherent in their development of documents and policies: https://wiki.idesg.org/wiki/index.php/Privacy_Requirements
 
+
<br>
  
 
==Term limits?==
 
==Term limits?==
 +
<br>

Latest revision as of 21:42, 15 February 2019


SEE ALSO:

  • Notes from 2010-2017 of potential member classes:

http://newshare.com/wiki/index.php/Blueprint-form



JAN. 16, 2019 NOTES FROM:

Amie Stepanovich U.S. Policy Manager | Global Policy Counsel
Access Now Washington, D.C. | accessnow.org
tel: +1.202.573.4721
amie@accessnow.org

People I would highly recommend outreach with:


What is ITEGA?

Pyramid strucure

  • Membership > Advisory Board > Governing Board > Board of Director


Stakeholders (thought exercise draft)

  • Publishers - either as a whole or divided into two separate groups
    • “Large Publishers”
    • “Small/Medium Publishers”
  • Private Sector (could also be a group of large / small)
    • Advertisers
    • Technical Service Providers
    • Identity Service Providers
  • “Public” (unaffiliated, independent individuals)
    • Academic
    • Civil Society either as a whole or divided into separate groups
    • Privacy Experts
    • Freedom of Expression Experts
    • Technologists / Engineers
    • Journalists

Proposed tiered structure

Small Board of Directors (perhaps 1/stakeholder group)

  • Governing Board (3-5/stakeholder group - set working groups, draft documents, consult between Board of Directors, Advisory Board, Membership)
  • Advisory Board (10-15/stakeholder group - large set consulted for general expertise and feedback)
  • Membership at large - this could just be publishers or interested parties at large
  • (Thought of representatives elected equally between those who are promoted from within the stakeholder group and those promoted by the group at large-- think of U.S. Senate v. HoR)


Term limits?