http://www.newshare.com/wiki/index.php?title=Blueprint-partners-wilkins-coney&feed=atom&action=historyBlueprint-partners-wilkins-coney - Revision history2024-03-28T11:29:32ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.31.1http://www.newshare.com/wiki/index.php?title=Blueprint-partners-wilkins-coney&diff=706&oldid=prevBill Densmore: New page: [[http://informationvalet.wordpress.com The Information Valet Project]] ==The Information Valet Project:== =<b>Blueprinting the shared user/valu...2008-12-01T20:44:36Z<p>New page: <a href="/wiki/index.php/File:Ivp-rji-logo.jpg" title="File:Ivp-rji-logo.jpg">thumb|350px|left|[[http://informationvalet.wordpress.com The Information Valet Project</a>]] ==The Information Valet Project:== =<b>Blueprinting the shared user/valu...</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>[[Image:Ivp-rji-logo.jpg|thumb|350px|left|[[http://informationvalet.wordpress.com The Information Valet Project]]]]<br />
==The Information Valet Project:==<br />
=<b>Blueprinting the shared user/value network</b>=<br />
===December 3-5, 2008<br>Reynolds Journalism Institute<br>Columbia, Missouri===<br />
<br />
[http://densmore.newshare.com/wiki/index.php/Blueprint HOME PAGE] . . . <br />
[http://densmore.newshare.com/wiki/index.php/Blueprint-partners PARTNER REPORTS INDEX] . . . .<br />
<br />
==11/29/08: Exchange from Prof. Lee Wilkins to Lillie Coney (EPIC)==<br />
<br />
Lee Wilkin's writes: <br />
<br />
CONTRIBUTION: A framing of the privacy questions the project raises through<br />
two disciplines--philosophy (what privacy adds to human flourishing) and law<br />
(why privacy should be considered a post hoc restriction on intrusion)<br />
connected by the concept of contested commodities--in other words, if there<br />
are elements of our individual privacy we are willing to part with for a<br />
price and under certain restrictions. Then, an explanation of a national<br />
research effort that explores these issues empirically with multiple<br />
generations in multiple venues, including public opinion polling, social<br />
networking cites, and generational in-person surveys.<br />
<br />
WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO LEARN: Which elements of personal privacy (assuming the<br />
notion of contested commodities has some explanatory power) are most likely<br />
to be subject to regulations and on what level. For example, if I were to<br />
bet money (my usual wager is one-tenth of a dollar), I would bet people will<br />
want regulation surrounding the issues of medical records and financial<br />
records. However, I think there ought to be some discussion of regulations<br />
an engineering specs for default settings on various cites (open is not<br />
always better) and on aggregators. I also think there ought to be some<br />
discussion of how poverty exacerbates many of these questions.</div>Bill Densmore