Difference between revisions of "NEMLC-fake-news"
(→Defining the Fake News Moment: Fiction, Fad, Fatal or Opportunity?) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
===Defining the Fake News Moment: Fiction, Fad, Fatal or Opportunity? === | ===Defining the Fake News Moment: Fiction, Fad, Fatal or Opportunity? === | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| − | < | + | <h3>Plenary breakout: 1:00 p.m.-1:45 p.m.<br><br></h3> |
<big>In the last six months, our political discourse has been infected by a new term: “Fake News.” In a 45-minute, circle-round session, we’ll probe the limits of what the term might mean, and how it might be an opportunity to mainstream media literacy education. We’ll drive toward a consensus statement, addressing such questions as: How do current concepts of “fake” news differ from what was published by 18th-century pamphleteers, or 1960s supermarket tabloids? Is news “fake” based on p0int of view only, or because it reports as facts things that are demonstrably untrue? Is it only “fake” if its intention is to mislead? Who defines “mislead?” In an age when all of us can be reporters via our Facebook feed, do we all need tutoring on how to create -- and consume -- trustworthy reporting and information? In social media, is news now anything more than verified gossip? Who is the trusted verifier? Our “conversation catalysts” will include Katherine Fry, a former journalist who now teaches graduate media-literacy education at CUNY-Brooklyn . . . and Allison Butler, who runs the media-literacy certificate program and teaches at UMass Amherst. They’ll be joined by Bill Densmore, a director of Journalism That Matters and a research fellow of the Donald W. Reynolds Journalism Institute at the Missouri School of Journalism. After the plenary discussion, Bulter and Fry will each lead half-hour, deeper-dive breakouts. </big> | <big>In the last six months, our political discourse has been infected by a new term: “Fake News.” In a 45-minute, circle-round session, we’ll probe the limits of what the term might mean, and how it might be an opportunity to mainstream media literacy education. We’ll drive toward a consensus statement, addressing such questions as: How do current concepts of “fake” news differ from what was published by 18th-century pamphleteers, or 1960s supermarket tabloids? Is news “fake” based on p0int of view only, or because it reports as facts things that are demonstrably untrue? Is it only “fake” if its intention is to mislead? Who defines “mislead?” In an age when all of us can be reporters via our Facebook feed, do we all need tutoring on how to create -- and consume -- trustworthy reporting and information? In social media, is news now anything more than verified gossip? Who is the trusted verifier? Our “conversation catalysts” will include Katherine Fry, a former journalist who now teaches graduate media-literacy education at CUNY-Brooklyn . . . and Allison Butler, who runs the media-literacy certificate program and teaches at UMass Amherst. They’ll be joined by Bill Densmore, a director of Journalism That Matters and a research fellow of the Donald W. Reynolds Journalism Institute at the Missouri School of Journalism. After the plenary discussion, Bulter and Fry will each lead half-hour, deeper-dive breakouts. </big> | ||
Revision as of 19:57, 11 January 2017
Contents
Northeast Media Literacy Conference: The Past, Present and Future of Media Literacy Education
Sat., Feb. 4, 2017
Central Connecticut State University
New Britain, Conn.
Defining the Fake News Moment: Fiction, Fad, Fatal or Opportunity?
Plenary breakout: 1:00 p.m.-1:45 p.m.
In the last six months, our political discourse has been infected by a new term: “Fake News.” In a 45-minute, circle-round session, we’ll probe the limits of what the term might mean, and how it might be an opportunity to mainstream media literacy education. We’ll drive toward a consensus statement, addressing such questions as: How do current concepts of “fake” news differ from what was published by 18th-century pamphleteers, or 1960s supermarket tabloids? Is news “fake” based on p0int of view only, or because it reports as facts things that are demonstrably untrue? Is it only “fake” if its intention is to mislead? Who defines “mislead?” In an age when all of us can be reporters via our Facebook feed, do we all need tutoring on how to create -- and consume -- trustworthy reporting and information? In social media, is news now anything more than verified gossip? Who is the trusted verifier? Our “conversation catalysts” will include Katherine Fry, a former journalist who now teaches graduate media-literacy education at CUNY-Brooklyn . . . and Allison Butler, who runs the media-literacy certificate program and teaches at UMass Amherst. They’ll be joined by Bill Densmore, a director of Journalism That Matters and a research fellow of the Donald W. Reynolds Journalism Institute at the Missouri School of Journalism. After the plenary discussion, Bulter and Fry will each lead half-hour, deeper-dive breakouts.
